Examining the Benefits of Water Births in a Hospital Setting: Perspectives from Midwives and Nurses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61963/jpkt.v2i2.44Keywords:
Prenatal Care, Childbirth, Postpartum, Hospital SettingAbstract
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the impact of midwifery-led care on maternal outcomes, maternal satisfaction, and newborn health in a hospital setting. Specifically, the study sought to compare the effects of midwifery-led care to standard care models, assess maternal preparedness for childbirth, explore rates of medical interventions, evaluate maternal satisfaction, and examine newborn health outcomes. Methods: A total of 200 expectant mothers receiving prenatal care at a tertiary hospital were recruited and randomly assigned to two groups: Group A (midwifery-led care) and Group B (standard care). Participants' demographic information, medical history, and preferences related to prenatal care were collected using a structured questionnaire. Validated surveys, including the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), were used to assess postpartum depression. Medical records and prenatal visits were reviewed throughout the pregnancy, and postpartum follow-ups were scheduled to assess maternal outcomes. Statistical analyses were performed to compare outcomes between the two groups. Results: Participants in the midwifery-led care group reported significantly higher levels of birth preparedness (p < 0.001), and rates of medical interventions during childbirth, including cesarean sections, were significantly lower compared to the standard care group (p < 0.05). Maternal satisfaction scores were significantly higher in the midwifery-led care group (p < 0.001). Additionally, the midwifery-led care group showed lower rates of postpartum depression (p < 0.01) and higher rates of exclusive breastfeeding at six weeks postpartum (p < 0.05). Neonates born to mothers in the midwifery-led care group had significantly lower rates of neonatal complications (p < 0.01). Conclusion: The findings of this study provide strong evidence for the positive impact of midwifery-led care on maternal outcomes, maternal satisfaction, and newborn health. The personalized and woman-centered approach of midwifery-led care contributes to improved maternal preparedness, reduced medical interventions, increased maternal satisfaction, lower rates of postpartum depression, and better newborn health outcomes. These results highlight the potential benefits of integrating midwifery-led care models into maternity services, aiming to enhance the overall birthing experience and improve maternal and infant health outcomes.
References
Adams, L. R., Collins, S. M., Johnson, M. P., & Smith, K. L. (2021). The Impact of Water Immersion during Labor and Birth: A Systematic Review. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health, 66(2), 124-135. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13294
Alliman, J., & Phillippi, J. C. (2016). Maternal outcomes in birth centers: an integrative review of the literature. Journal of midwifery & women's health, 61(1), 21-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.12356
Atan, ?. U., Ozturk, R., Satir, D. G., Çalim, S. I., Weller, B. K., Amanak, K., ... & Akercan, F. (2018). Relation between mothers’ types of labor, birth interventions, birth experiences and postpartum depression: A multicentre follow-up study. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare, 18, 13-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2018.08.001
Brady, S., Lee, N., Gibbons, K., & Bogossian, F. (2019). Woman-centred care: An integrative review of the empirical literature. International journal of nursing studies, 94, 107-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.01.001
Brown, A., Davies, R., & Sharma, N. (2020). Breastfeeding and nursing support: A systematic review of interventions. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 16(1), e12977. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12977
Carter, A. B., Thompson, E. R., Wilson, C. J., & Brown, S. M. (2022). Water Births in a Hospital Setting: Addressing Challenges and Best Practices. Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care, 49(1), 78-89. https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12514
Dahlberg, U., Persen, J., Skogås, A. K., Selboe, S. T., Torvik, H. M., & Aune, I. (2016). How can midwives promote a normal birth and a positive birth experience? The experience of first-time Norwegian mothers. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare, 7, 2-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2015.08.001
De Kock, J. H., Latham, H. A., Leslie, S. J., Grindle, M., Munoz, S. A., Ellis, L., ... & O’Malley, C. M. (2021). A rapid review of the impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of healthcare workers: implications for supporting psychological well-being. BMC public health, 21, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-10070-3
De Labrusse, C., Ramelet, A. S., Humphrey, T., & Maclennan, S. J. (2016). Patient-centered care in maternity services: a critical appraisal and synthesis of the literature. Women's Health Issues, 26(1), 100-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2015.09.003
Edmonds, J. K., Ivanof, J., & Kafulafula, U. (2020). Midwife led units: transforming maternity care globally. Annals of global health, 86(1). https://doi.org/10.5334%2Faogh.2794
Eri, T. S., Berg, M., Dahl, B., Gottfreðsdóttir, H., Sommerseth, E., & Prinds, C. (2020). Models for midwifery care: A mapping review. European Journal of Midwifery, 4. https://doi.org/10.18332%2Fejm%2F124110
Figueiredo, B., Canário, C., & Field, T. (2014). Breastfeeding is negatively affected by prenatal depression and reduces postpartum depression. Psychological medicine, 44(5), 927-936. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291713001530
Gustafsson, I., Nyström, M., & Palmér, L. (2017). Midwives’ lived experience of caring for new mothers with initial breastfeeding difficulties: A phenomenological study. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare, 12, 9-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2016.12.003
Healy, S., Humphreys, E., & Kennedy, C. (2016). Midwives’ and obstetricians’ perceptions of risk and its impact on clinical practice and decision-making in labour: An integrative review. Women and Birth, 29(2), 107-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2015.08.010
Hodnett, E. D., Fredericks, S., Weston, J., & Lamontagne, C. (2019). Support during pregnancy for women at increased risk of low birthweight babies. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2019(8), CD000198. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000198.pub4
Hunter, B., Segrott, J., & Fleming, C. (2021). The impact of continuity of midwifery care for women with social or medical risk factors on postpartum depression: the COSMOS single-site two-arm pilot RCT. Public Health Research, 9(11), 1-188. https://doi.org/10.3310/phr09110
Johnson, R. A., Miller, E. M., Wilson, J. K., & Martinez, P. L. (2020). Advancing Maternal Care: The Role of Midwifery and Nursing Practices. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 76(9), 2078-2091. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14425
Jones, L. C., & Brown, C. R. (2018). Nursing Interventions for Birth Preparedness: A Meta-analysis. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, 47(4), 502-511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2018.04.012
Jones, L. K., Brown, C. R., & Pritchard, V. E. (2022). Mobile health applications for prenatal care: A systematic review. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 51(2), E14-E27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2021.11.001
Karlström, A., Nystedt, A., & Hildingsson, I. (2015). The meaning of a very positive birth experience: focus groups discussions with women. BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 15, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0683-0
Martinez, M. A., Martinez-Schallmoser, L., & Lindeke, L. L. (2019). Cultural competence in maternal care: Perspectives of perinatal nurses. MCN: The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing, 44(3), 147-152. https://doi.org/10.1097/nmc.0000000000000519
Martinez, M. A., Smith, T. G., Anderson, L. R., & Johnson, D. W. (2020). Cultural Competence in Maternal Care: Training and Strategies for Healthcare Providers. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 31(5), 461-469. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659620934251
Salam, R. A., Mansoor, T., Mallick, D., Lassi, Z. S., Das, J. K., & Bhutta, Z. A. (2014). Essential childbirth and postnatal interventions for improved maternal and neonatal health. Reproductive health, 11, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-11-S1-S3
Sandall, J., Soltani, H., Gates, S., Shennan, A., & Devane, D. (2018). Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2018(10), CD004667. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub5
Smith, J. M., Jones, L. K., Adams, B. A., & Wilson, M. R. (2019). The Impact of Midwifery-led Care on Maternal Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health, 64(4), 440-451. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13008 ]
Smith, V., Gallagher, L., Carroll, M., Hannon, K., & Begley, C. (2019). Antenatal and intrapartum interventions for reducing caesarean section, promoting vaginal birth, and reducing fear of childbirth: an overview of systematic reviews. PLoS One, 14(10), e0224313. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224313
Symon, A., Pringle, J., Cheyne, H., Downe, S., Hundley, V., Lee, E., ... & Alderdice, F. (2016). Midwifery-led antenatal care models: mapping a systematic review to an evidence-based quality framework to identify key components and characteristics of care. BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 16, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0944-6
Verbiest, S., Tully, K., Simpson, M., & Stuebe, A. (2018). Elevating mothers’ voices: Recommendations for improved patient-centered postpartum. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 41(5), 577-590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-018-9961-4
Wadephul, F., Glover, L., & Jomeen, J. (2020). Conceptualising women's perinatal well-being: a systematic review of theoretical discussions. Midwifery, 81, 102598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2019.102598
World Health Organization. (2015). WHO statement on caesarean section rates. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/161442/WHO_R
Yuill, C., McCourt, C., Cheyne, H., & Leister, N. (2020). Women’s experiences of decision-making and informed choice about pregnancy and birth care: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research. BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 20, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03023-6
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Perilaku Kesehatan Terpadu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Please find the rights and licenses in Register: Jupiter Perilaku Kesehatan Terpadu. By submitting the article/manuscript of the article, the author(s) agree with this policy. No specific document sign-off is required.
1. License
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
2. Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User/Public Rights
Register's spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, Register permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and Register on distributing works in the journal and other media of publications. Unless otherwise stated, the authors are public entities as soon as their articles got published.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights;
Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
The right to use the substance of the article in own future works, including lectures and books,
The right to reproduce the article for own purposes,
The right to self-archive the article (please read out deposit policy),
The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal (Register: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Sistem Informasi).
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any authors submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. Register will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. Register will only communicate with the corresponding author.
6. Royalties
Being an open accessed journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons license term mentioned, author(s) aware that Register entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees.
7. Miscellaneous
Register will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed. Register's editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers as mentioned in point 3.

